Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
joe knows better everything..;-)
Offline
Eden wrote:
If I recall, the only other person in all my years here (besides pearl) to ever bring my child into one of their verbal attacks was Dano. Funny enough he was the only person (besides pearl) to put smiley faces after personal insults also.
Though in all fairness, I was a bit of an ass back then.
Eden In fairness to everyone your personal point of view of what actually occurred is not entirely true . .I did try to point out how your macho male plagiarized ideas would affect your relationship with your child, and wife, in the wild. I even tried to point out how the beliefs would even hurt them and how uncooperative they were in your relationship with your wife . I am sorry if you thought otherwise since i do not know your wife or child but i was listening to you rant . Talking to to you about your wild man rants . Addressing your ideas, about going back to the dark ages, escaping into the woods, and pointing out where they led .
I take full responsibility for the confusion . Pearl you are right that i am too old for you. As for neurosis that disease has to be attached to a belief we hold dear, and defend. A person dead or alive we compare others to like idolizing Jesus, or someone we only read about in a book. Sometimes a movie star. Someone we never knew personally ourselves not that psychological comparison is ever from an inner state of goodness, insights, or fair to anyone. Psychological labeling is not even good for our children . That comparison of others with Jesus, or anyone else we read about, or saw on video is from an actual nervous disorder called neurosis . :-)
Offline
everyone wrote:
I am sorry if you thought otherwise since i do not know your wife or child but i was listening to you rant . Talking to to you about your wild man rants . Addressing your ideas, about going back to the dark ages, escaping into the woods, and pointing out where they led .
First of all, I hardly ranted. You were the daily ranter. Secondly, I never suggested going back to the dark ages in any way, nor did I ever suggest escaping into the woods, rather that was your own neurosis which continues to misinterpret me to this day. You couldn't relate to what I was sharing and naturally your immature brain had to slap some sort of label on me, and "cannibal" was the best you could come up with. How lame.
Offline
Eden wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
My only concern is survival.
bruce sean wrote:
I don't do puzzles, and chess has a practical reason for me.
Eden wrote:
I'm all ears.
bruce sean wrote:
Oh, no, let's not get personal. It's not important: let's just say that I see chess as a stupid game, yet I'm playing it!
And there you have it...the mind of bruce in a nutshell.
The mind of who exactly?
Offline
pearl wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
Oh, no, let's not get personal. It's not important: let's just say that I see chess as a stupid game, yet I'm playing it!
Indeed, you do many stupid things knowing how stupid. Thus far you've only played games.
I've said many a time: Bruce is quite stupid, left to his own devices. Bruce is an idiot.
Offline
Bruce is in every one of your posts.
Offline
I wouldn't bet on it: my whom posts?
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
I've said many a time: Bruce is quite stupid, left to his own devices. Bruce is an idiot.
Perhaps you should throw Bruce off a tall bridge?
Offline
He killed himself long time ago, but not consciously.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
I wouldn't bet on it: my whom posts?
bruce sean is in every one of bruce sean's posts.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
He killed himself long time ago, but not consciously.
Not true at all. He is as alive as he has ever been.
Offline
I don't know. As I said: he killed himself long ago.
Offline
Eden wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
He killed himself long time ago, but not consciously.
Not true at all. He is as alive as he has ever been.
Nope. He's dead, indeed.
Offline
Ahhh....so he is a zombie. Got it.
Offline
No, no: once he's dead he's dead, he can't come back. Just like a magician's trick: once it's seen, it's over. He WAS a magician's trick.
Offline
Eden wrote:
everyone wrote:
I am sorry if you thought otherwise since i do not know your wife or child but i was listening to you rant . Talking to to you about your wild man rants . Addressing your ideas, about going back to the dark ages, escaping into the woods, and pointing out where they led .
First of all, I hardly ranted. You were the daily ranter. Secondly, I never suggested going back to the dark ages in any way, nor did I ever suggest escaping into the woods, rather that was your own neurosis which continues to misinterpret me to this day. You couldn't relate to what I was sharing and naturally your immature brain had to slap some sort of label on me, and "cannibal" was the best you could come up with. How lame.
Fine we will stick to your admittance . You were an ass in those days but an ass that still thinks you were never wrong about chest thumping and playing Tarzan. Living self sufficiently as the macho male ruling the family, or tribe.
Going back to the woods and shunning science, and technology, and all education for your children except the education you think they need? Deciding picking and choosing from your own limited experiences, and personal decisions and memories with almost no cooperation whatsoever in your relationship with your own wife? Only you as the King of your family, living in a tent, or log cabin in the woods, think is necessary ? I never used the word cannibal excluding myself.
I think Lena suggested you sounded like a cannibal . She was not far from wrong about most of us was she ? We eat our cousins like cannibals whether we do the killing, or the carving up, or the butcher does, and most still think war, influence, and debate is the path to discussion, dialogue and inner peace ? Any human being a new Adam or a new Eve can play at being an Alpha male, or female, or a beautiful silver back ape here ?
Thumping our own chest fighting with our fellow mankind in our own prime time. We most of us are still acting like Cretans without any real goodness, or love, or light of our own inside helping us make a mirror to see what vain animals most really are becoming by trying to hide from what is, and not face facts about ourselves being similar to the rest of mankind ?
Eden please Keep in mind your also talking about Troys Ning not anything that happened here at the K.F.A. forum. Even Troy erred when he continued his own personal prejudices, and brought others pasts, and others malicious gossip, his own personal grudges about them, from Ning, and Kinfonet here . Even bringing gossip about others past, into his own decisions to censor, and erase people here . Most ridicule others past without seeing their own past mistakes ? I think if you've never been banned from anywhere, never admitted you were wrong, never extremely generous, your not much of an Inquirer, or explorer anyway. At the least your not speaking out for reasonable free speech, and the right to a reasonable defense, and most of us have been asses in the past even Troy, and myself . :-)
Last edited by everyone (2012-02-10 09:02:18)
Offline
Eden wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
I wouldn't bet on it: my whom posts?
bruce sean is in every one of bruce sean's posts.
Whether we see it or not, both strategies in the becoming, and unbecoming entity, are false and cannot be ended without an awareness of the totality of the self conscious self ? A seeing that includes what we most are in denial of, the deeper fear, at the root of both the assertive, positing aggressive bullying, becoming self , as well as the asserting, positing aggressive unbecoming self ? It is fear that is the engine of both strategies fundamentally no different in life. Both strategies, patterns maintain the self without negating or ending the self creatively, as an original in life, in direct contact with life itself . :-)
Offline
thick air
Offline
awareness wrote:
thick air
What is it to be aware without bias, without the interference of the past ? ? Is it possible to say i am awareness, and be aware ? Or more reasonable to say I am similar thick air, mirrors and smoke without flame, as all assertions, and fundamental self positing, or non self positing and bragging of most of mankind, mentally enslaved to thought, and mostly not aware of that myself ? :-)
Last edited by everyone (2012-02-10 09:39:37)
Offline
there is no one, who is awareness. the thought is not mine, the body is not mine, the mind is not mine, the name is not mine. so what is yours?
the stream of consciousness undergoes a constant ending, which is the constant transformation of accumulation, in which there is truth, is not mine
Offline
(maybe you should contact life itself)
Online
tree wrote:
(maybe you should contact life itself)
life is contact, is relationship, in which is the ending of you,yours,me,mine,us,we,our...
Offline