KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

You are not logged in.

Announcement

To use the forum: 1) request the creation of a new account by clicking Register and sending us an email with your desired username 2) new users will be e-mailed a random password within three business days. They can then log in and change this password in their profile if they see fit. This feature also requires users to verify new e-mail addresses if they choose to change from the one they registered with 3) click Dialogue Forum link to enter the dialogue forum 4) click on an existing thread or post a new topic 5) enjoy the dialogue.....
Kindly be mindful of the following points regarding the forum. Dialogue is thinking together - it isn’t debate - and it's inquiring together without end point or agenda. People come into the dialogue from their own place of understanding, which is not going to be your place of understanding. We’re here to communicate together, learn together and gain insight into our own thought; to receive and share our observations, not impose our views on others. Address the comments in a polite, considerate manner. By all means, ask for clarification, but challenge the comment, not the commentator. We don’t know enough about the others to make those judgments and we’re here to learn about ourselves, not to correct another's perceived personality flaws. If a comment brings an emotional response, look at that. Do you feel the need to defend? To attack? Time for some looking inward. Self protection results in war. Besides, the war is in each of us. Stop that war, and the rest will take care of itself. (For some suggestions on the nature of dialogue, please click here)

Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com

#326 2012-01-25 08:40:48

tree
Member
Registered: 2009-01-02
Posts: 9900

Re: adaptation...

kirsten wrote:

the k-family ten years ago.. nothing changed ?

i've looked at this archived material before, it appeared to me that they "scrubbed" all the nasitness before it was archived, anyway, let there be peace on earth for everyone....

Offline

 

#327 2012-01-25 12:45:17

snguyen
Member
Registered: 2009-04-15
Posts: 3370

Re: adaptation...

What is the inquiry about?

Online

 

#328 2012-01-25 12:58:14

joe
Member
From: ohio
Registered: 2008-03-17
Posts: 15091
Website

Re: adaptation...

tree wrote:

joe wrote:

tree wrote:


as was said, i frequently changed names with each post in order to address the substance of the moment, so the name chosen was also part of the comment, there came a time when it was technically not possible to do that without re-registering

I asked you if it was entirely random and accounted for that not having much residue, but if a name is carried into more than one post then the identity and thought accompanying that identity are carried as well.  That is what I am asking you about.  In your next reply all you did is go personal again.  Cut it out tree, we are all adults here.  If you do not want to answer the question then say so.

not sure what you mean by personal and really not interested in wrestling with your "context"

one cannot fit the big into the small (that's not personal, it's physics)

you are assigning the context to me in this reply as well (which is personal) , when that is only a misunderstanding of what is meant.

Offline

 

#329 2012-01-25 13:21:51

tree
Member
Registered: 2009-01-02
Posts: 9900

Re: adaptation...

joe wrote:

tree wrote:

joe wrote:

I asked you if it was entirely random and accounted for that not having much residue, but if a name is carried into more than one post then the identity and thought accompanying that identity are carried as well.  That is what I am asking you about.  In your next reply all you did is go personal again.  Cut it out tree, we are all adults here.  If you do not want to answer the question then say so.

not sure what you mean by personal and really not interested in wrestling with your "context"

one cannot fit the big into the small (that's not personal, it's physics)

you are assigning the context to me in this reply as well (which is personal) , when that is only a misunderstanding of what is meant.

it's a  term you've used joe and i'm really not interested in a definition

and wasn't it you who requested information about my personal circumstances and what names i've used...

not going round and round with this joe, happy to let it end, thanks

Last edited by tree (2012-01-25 13:22:21)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson