Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
beans wrote:
Well, feel free to unload your problems here, it's such a warm and cozy, nonjudgmental place these days :-)
thanks, your honor
Offline
welcome, highness
Offline
kirsten wrote:
hahaha
haha
ha
uh
What, you don't feel it
)
Offline
you won't hear me judge judge hehe lollilol
Offline
Aw, fudge, go on witchya'll :-)
Offline
\m/
Offline
....brought to you by the letter "m"?
Offline
bootsy..
Offline

Offline
("all stand for the Honorable Stumpy")
Offline

.......~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~can't stand it......~~~~~~~^....~~~~~~~uh!
Offline
(can't stand your love...uh!)
Offline
Give peace a chance B
knock yourself out
Offline
beans wrote:
are you going to Scarborouh Fair?
Offline
Look who's asking...
Offline
beans wrote:
Look who's asking...
good tidings to all
Offline
and to you, to All, and to It which has no name
Offline
snguyen wrote:
Suppose we never heard of the explanation on aloneness, would we know what it really means?
Yes, if we rightly inquire because the fact is independent of the explanation.
snguyen wrote:
So I ask you, how do you come to know aloneness as you said above in your actual life?
Well sir, that requires the understanding the workings of the consciousness.
snguyen wrote:
But actually, a relationship when thought ends is something I don’t know,
Well sir if thought has ended then you are observing the person or the object without the past.Therefore you are seeing & understanding the present state undistorted. So then you are responding to the actual position, not to an image, which is therefore to be correctly related.
snguyen wrote:
The direct, clear, very bright and sharp perception at the moment was its own value,
Well that perception & the response arising out of the perception appears to be true relationship to me.
snguyen wrote:
Again, if we did not hear the word sir K used, would you use it, and why?
Yes. If K used the appropriate word in his description then another seeing will used the same or similar words. If I say 'chair' referring to an object, seeing it you would use the same word, isn't it sir? Otherwise can there be communication?
snguyen wrote:
And I am sorry if it seems to you personal at any point,
That's OK sir. What you stated was one possibility. I said it may or may not be the case.
Last edited by Jayaraj (2012-04-02 07:40:17)
Offline