KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

bruce sean wrote:

When we are that, all of our problems are over.

oh goodie!

snguyen wrote:

Oh my goodness Joe. Time and again you sound softly like a teenager complaining about things of teenage time. And it happens again and again, especially with Pearl. I remember one time Bob wrote a long message explaining unfortunately lengthily about how he defended this or that person under your curiosity. And, why are you so interested in such little things, instead of more serious inquiry into your own book of life and then publish your work for me, so that we have more footing to understand each other? For that, you say you cannot tell, but for things like Roots’ praises on me, which I never open a word of reception of it, you carry it with you???

I am tired of explaining it again for you Joe. I have been working on it, with and without the forum, much less Roots the occasional exclamation. I mean, if sometimes I love the work of Willy, or Bruce, I do jump aboard and exclaim: oh how I love you, friendliness, exploding joy I found a seer and such. What is wrong in it for the long term then? Do I follow it in a corruptive way? Do I corrupt or spoil my wife when everyday I say to her: Oh how I love you baby!! Gosh, that is stuff we do from time to time.

First time Roots said it, I felt awkward but second time he discussed with Pearl, I stopped it. Simply put. I think you like to do psychology more than this difficult K stuff.

Si, you are ignoring the actuality...it has happened for roots entire time on the forum, and this is the first time you said anything about it.  Again, if you do not understand what the problem is with it then there is no point in addressing it, and from what you are saying your conditioning is to not correct immediately but to wait.  But this is cultural conditioning, one of the very basic messages K has put out.  I have asked you in roots previous time here and also again since his return to see it for what it is and how it is not generative toward 'serious' enquiry.  My discussions with samata are childish when I join in the childishness that the posts are typically constructed of, so guilty do I plea there.  So there it is Si, the challenge of facing the cultural conditioning is right before you.  Will you stay sensitive to me mentioning it or face the conditioning for what it is and no longer follow it?  I am not trying to piss you off, really.

bruce sean wrote:

tree wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9 … eLCVkOsZPx

When we are that, all of our problems are over.

oh goodie!

You seem skeptical.

joe wrote:

snguyen wrote:

Oh my goodness Joe. Time and again you sound softly like a teenager complaining about things of teenage time. And it happens again and again, especially with Pearl. I remember one time Bob wrote a long message explaining unfortunately lengthily about how he defended this or that person under your curiosity. And, why are you so interested in such little things, instead of more serious inquiry into your own book of life and then publish your work for me, so that we have more footing to understand each other? For that, you say you cannot tell, but for things like Roots’ praises on me, which I never open a word of reception of it, you carry it with you???

I am tired of explaining it again for you Joe. I have been working on it, with and without the forum, much less Roots the occasional exclamation. I mean, if sometimes I love the work of Willy, or Bruce, I do jump aboard and exclaim: oh how I love you, friendliness, exploding joy I found a seer and such. What is wrong in it for the long term then? Do I follow it in a corruptive way? Do I corrupt or spoil my wife when everyday I say to her: Oh how I love you baby!! Gosh, that is stuff we do from time to time.

First time Roots said it, I felt awkward but second time he discussed with Pearl, I stopped it. Simply put. I think you like to do psychology more than this difficult K stuff.

Si, you are ignoring the actuality...it has happened for roots entire time on the forum, and this is the first time you said anything about it.  Again, if you do not understand what the problem is with it then there is no point in addressing it, and from what you are saying your conditioning is to not correct immediately but to wait.  But this is cultural conditioning, one of the very basic messages K has put out.  I have asked you in roots previous time here and also again since his return to see it for what it is and how it is not generative toward 'serious' enquiry.  My discussions with samata are childish when I join in the childishness that the posts are typically constructed of, so guilty do I plea there.  So there it is Si, the challenge of facing the cultural conditioning is right before you.  Will you stay sensitive to me mentioning it or face the conditioning for what it is and no longer follow it?  I am not trying to piss you off, really.

Not your discussions, but you are childish rather and so contribute nothing of significance to the inquiry.

hehehe, bruce...I did not know either of them around a card table, did you?

tree wrote:

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9 … Sqa0BiHuYQ

?

always on the make..eh beans

no sale today, b

yeah, free beans

buena noche

bruce sean wrote:

I have no doubts about either of them-and by saying that I'm not putting them in the same bowl, quite the opposite. No need to have personally known either of them: the words are speaking for them.

if the baton has no shine on it I can't pick it up.  Somebody already did.

Mama no dogface to the banana patch.