Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
pearl wrote:
Will tell you when it's time, hang on there, Bob :-)
OK pearl. When it's time just give me the signal and I will jump out of the bushes like a swashbuckling pirate.
Offline
pearl wrote:
Will tell you when it's time, hang on there, Bob :-)
BobD wrote:
OK pearl. When it's time just give me the signal and I will jump out of the bushes like a swashbuckling pirate
Online
Eden wrote:
sds wrote:
pearl wrote:
All dull, dead vegetables! :-)
I am just the messenger, I just shared this list, but it is not my list.
And I agree, many of them are very dull indeed.... Dead....
It is funny to see so many cultic, perverted, egotistical, and dull people on this list, which is supposed to be a list of spiritual people. They are anything from spiritual in my opinion.
It is interesting though to stay informed to see what the average person believes in and who they look to for their spirituality.... Hence this list....I'm looking forward to you and pearl collaborating on the list of non-vegetables.
When do you think it might be compiled? And please do let us know if you need any financial assistance as I feel it is a very worthy cause.
Here is my partial list, my compiliation.
Some of the true spiritual people are:
Professor Krishna, Rajesh Dalal, Swami Chidananda, Mark Lee, Gopal Krishnamurty, Michael Krohnen, Ruben Feldman Gonzalez, Hillary Rodrigues....
These are all K people, people who have knew or studied deeply K's teachings. These are the only true spiritual people on the planet... The rest are followers, not really spiritual....
Offline
If you are going to use the "spiritual label" wouldn't it stand to reason that there are no non spiritual people. Only those that don't recognize it?
I have one question for you sds. (Don't choose to take offense...It doesn't really matter if you choose not to answer. I am just curious) How old are you?
Offline
BobD wrote:
If you are going to use the "spiritual label" wouldn't it stand to reason that there are no non spiritual people. Only those that don't recognize it?
I have one question for you sds. (Don't choose to take offense...It doesn't really matter if you choose not to answer. I am just curious) How old are you?
Yes, spiritual, non spiritual, it is all nonsense. No such thing to label anyone as such...
I am birthless and deathless Bob. I have never been born nor will I die.
But I have been told by those around me who believe in life and death, that I was born over 40 years ago, and say I am in my 40's. But to me, I am ETERNAL.......
Offline
I forgot to ask Bob, why are you interested in knowing my chronological physical age? Why I ask? And may I ask you, how old are you Bob? What difference does it make your age? Really, am curious?
Offline
Spirituality is mostly entertainment as K rightly observed.
Most on those list have a long way to go to finding and living from that which is Sacred and that which is untouched by thought....
Last edited by sds (2012-03-11 19:35:37)
Offline
Especially the Deidas and Babas, they are so far away from the Sacred....
All they know is exploitation, control, greed, followers, ego.....
Offline
sds wrote:
pearl wrote:
All dull, dead vegetables! :-)
Professor Krishna, Rajesh Dalal, Swami Chidananda, Mark Lee, Gopal Krishnamurty, Michael Krohnen, Ruben Feldman Gonzalez, Hillary Rodrigues....
These are all K people, people who have knew or studied deeply K's teachings. These are the only true spiritual people on the planet... The rest are followers, not really spiritual....
Speaking of dull vegetables....you ever been to a K gathering? I have.
Offline
Eden wrote: "Speaking of dull vegetables....you ever been to a K gathering? I have."
I have never been to a K gathering. I would love to go. I am dreaming of the day when I get to be around so many K people and participate in talks, dialogues, etc.
Offline
I recall when I used to feel exactly the same. Seems like it was lifetimes ago. For me their dullness was repulsive, though for you it will probably feel like open arms. Such is life.
Offline
sds wrote:
I forgot to ask Bob, why are you interested in knowing my chronological physical age? Why I ask? And may I ask you, how old are you Bob? What difference does it make your age? Really, am curious?
I am 52. I was curious because I sometimes perceive a little youthful naivety in some of the things that you write. Thats all
Offline
I am 85, and that explains why everyone here but me seems a tad naive in what they post.
Ha!
Offline
wilbro99 wrote:
I am 85, and that explains why everyone here but me seems a tad naive in what they post.
Ha!
Laughing, that is quite funny wilbro, thanks for the belly laugh.
Offline
BobD wrote:
sds wrote:
I forgot to ask Bob, why are you interested in knowing my chronological physical age? Why I ask? And may I ask you, how old are you Bob? What difference does it make your age? Really, am curious?
I am 52. I was curious because I sometimes perceive a little youthful naivety in some of the things that you write. Thats all
Bob, only 10 chronological years separates us or so. And yet, we are worlds apart. You are anything but naive and I still have my youthful naivety.
Thanks for toning it down to just seeing it in some of the things that I write. Some might say it is in all that I write. ![]()
Offline
wilbro99 wrote:
I am 85, and that explains why everyone here but me seems a tad naive in what they post.
Ha!
don't stop now Wilyum,
because however much you may like to play
it stll must come to you
Online
RJOLLY wrote:
this urge to comment on the conversation of another
it comes from loneliness, spite, boredom?
what is your motive?
Offline
Age has nothing to do with wisdom, maturity, trust me. My son of 9 yrs shows more maturity, wisdom and humor than any of these people here on this forum and he doesn't need to be talking about it like these intellectuals do. He lives acts in such a manner and therefore is it. Even willy could learn something from him, ha! :-)
Offline
Oh ya, only a stupid person devoid of any real intelligence would ever complie such a list of "spiritual people".
Offline
pearl wrote:
… Even willy could learn something from him, ha! :-)
Holy mother of pearl, how did the carpenter miss that one?
Offline
beans wrote:
RJOLLY wrote:
this urge to comment on the conversation of another
it comes from loneliness, spite, boredom?
what is your motive?
differentiate between two people talking with each other (a conversation) and the above thread where there are numerous contributors (a discussion/melee/forum/free-for-all)
this comment was made to Wilbro with affection, and it has a history in that he and I have conversed around this matter before, however haltingly, or uselessly.
he can respond to it however he wishes, you, on the other hand, again sound shrill.
why so sour?
with whom have you exchanged love today, or the day before?
Online
RJ wrote:
beans wrote:
RJOLLY wrote:
this urge to comment on the conversation of another
it comes from loneliness, spite, boredom?
what is your motive?differentiate between two people talking with each other (a conversation) and the above thread where there are numerous contributors (a discussion/melee/forum/free-for-all)
this comment was made to Wilbro with affection, and it has a history in that he and I have conversed around this matter before, however haltingly, or uselessly.
he can respond to it however he wishes, you, on the other hand, again sound shrill.
why so sour?
with whom have you exchanged love today, or the day before?
Again, interpretation (and resulting excuses) is everything RJOLLY!
The heigh ho, the holly,
This Life is most iolly....
As You Like It goes on the e-shelf for the night...and beans goes in the can...WHAT!? LOL! Meh
Offline
Look deeper, grasshopper, there may be beauty and intelligence in chaos.
Chaos in a can! Ha, maybe that can be marketed along with UF. :-)
Last edited by beans (2012-03-12 01:08:02)
Offline