KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

She sang the highest praises onto you Eden too, not that long ago. How quickly it changes with her.

BobD wrote:

Nothing at all taken personal eden. We all see others through the filters of our emotions. A clear picture of anyone is not easy and probably impossible on a forum like this. No one here is exempt

If there is any doubt as to what someone here is like, one only need look at those whom they praise or those whom they are close to in the real world.  If a man or woman has no close friends of integrity/maturity in the real world, and they are hanging around this forum singing someone's highest praises one minute, and the next minute saying that person is the most untrustable idiot, I think one can get a pretty good sense of whether or not you would trust that person to unwaveringly reflect your love and openness in the real world.

Eden wrote:

BobD wrote:

Real communication is always happening but understanding is not. I can never understand another until I first assess my reactions and misunderstandings of another. In the end...we are all communicationg with ourselves. My ability to truly understand another is my ability to understand myself

Quite right.  To the extent that one constantly misunderstands and labels another body, one is clueless of one's own.

Agreed. And there are a lot of clueless people on this forum telling everyone else how clueless they are. Personally...I'm better off being clueless, consequently it doesn't bother me that much. One that is clueless is much more teachable than one that is not. The problem is no one wants to admit to their clueless nature.

sds wrote:

She still is a very intelligent woman to me and I still love her dearly and respect her.

I agree with you though that Pearl is a very poor judge of male character.

And I too am a poor judge of females.

So pearl is unstable and a poor judge of character and very intelligent? Quite the barometer you have.  I suggest you throw it in the trash.

I see you are using the same barometer to measure your own intelligence also.

It's time also that Bob reveals his little dark side.  C'mmon Bob let it out.  Now is your time.  Don't let it drag on.

pearl wrote:

That's a group of wimpy, second hand males consoling and convincing them selves for the lack integrity, ha,ha.  Really funny.  By the end of it all you'll have nobody, not a sinlge woman of integrity move towards you.  You'll have other wimpy females and males of the forum support you though. 
Life here is simply breath taking, even our home is filled with love and beauty and creativity and integrity than you'll ever fathom or even touch.   You guys have a long, long way to go until you mature and become men.  Until then adios! :-)

I hate to say it Pearl, but in this post, now you are sounding like Eden. This is something he would write.

sds wrote:

My only question left about her is: Who is left for her to talk to?

So many of us are out, who is left?

Bob D is about the only one I can think of.....

I don't have any expectations of pearl or anyone else here. I don't have a desire to change, control or teach pearl.  I don't expect pearl to agree with me, defend me, or even like me for that matter. None of you should either. And if what pearl says bothers you, it's your problem...not her's. And vice-versa.  It's really not that complicated if you can get your ego out of the way. It's as simple as: Would you rather be right or happy?

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

She still is a very intelligent woman to me and I still love her dearly and respect her.

I agree with you though that Pearl is a very poor judge of male character.

And I too am a poor judge of females.

So pearl is unstable and a poor judge of character and very intelligent? Quite the barometer you have.  I suggest you throw it in the trash.

I see you are using the same barometer to measure your own intelligence also.

Says one creep to another...

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

But I still love and respect her dearly, as I am sure you do too.

Until you have felt her through her shells, you don't even know who/what you are speaking about.  The only pearl you know is her shells.

says a deida follower to the ramana follower...

pearl wrote:

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

She still is a very intelligent woman to me and I still love her dearly and respect her.

I agree with you though that Pearl is a very poor judge of male character.

And I too am a poor judge of females.

So pearl is unstable and a poor judge of character and very intelligent? Quite the barometer you have.  I suggest you throw it in the trash.

I see you are using the same barometer to measure your own intelligence also.

Says one creep to another...

I will ask again. Who is not a creep on this forum in your eyes?

BobD wrote:

sds wrote:

My only question left about her is: Who is left for her to talk to?

So many of us are out, who is left?

Bob D is about the only one I can think of.....

I don't have any expectations of pearl or anyone else here. I don't have a desire to change, control or teach pearl.  I don't expect pearl to agree with me, defend me, or even like me for that matter. None of you should either. And if what pearl says bothers you, it's your problem...not her's. And vice-versa.  It's really not that complicated if you can get your ego out of the way. It's as simple as: Would you rather be right or happy?

To SDS.  Do not worry.  Life doesn't depend on you or any other on this forum.  Maybe to most of you it does the reason why you never stand alone.  But if there's even one person I can talk to, it's great, if not, no darned probs! I'll still be the happiest one alive! :-))

pearl wrote:

BobD wrote:

sds wrote:

My only question left about her is: Who is left for her to talk to?

So many of us are out, who is left?

Bob D is about the only one I can think of.....

I don't have any expectations of pearl or anyone else here. I don't have a desire to change, control or teach pearl.  I don't expect pearl to agree with me, defend me, or even like me for that matter. None of you should either. And if what pearl says bothers you, it's your problem...not her's. And vice-versa.  It's really not that complicated if you can get your ego out of the way. It's as simple as: Would you rather be right or happy?

To SDS.  Do not worry.  Life doesn't depend on you or any other on this forum.  Maybe to most of you it does the reason why you never stand alone.  But if there's even one person I can talk to, it's great, if not, no darned probs! I'll still be the happiest one alive! :-))

You are just lying to yourself. I do not believe you.

Your main issue I see is that you revolt when you think you see that others are followers or are following. It just sets you off, triggers you....

Look at your own self and I would bet there is some issue going on that is not resolved about following or being a follower within yourself.

And you are about down to one or two only left in this forum according to my calculations.

pearl wrote:

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

But I still love and respect her dearly, as I am sure you do too.

Until you have felt her through her shells, you don't even know who/what you are speaking about.  The only pearl you know is her shells.

says a deida follower to the ramana follower...

You are probably not interested, but if you are, it might be helpful to define what you mean by the word "Follower"

Can't one read a book by Ramana without necessarily being his follower. How do you know I am his follower? What do I follow?

Can't one read a book by K? Didnt you read some books by K at one point? Does that make you a follower?