KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

There is a place for everything in this thread. All has its place.....

sds wrote:

You can notice how your diet affects the openness in yourself and others. True, you can be open as love and eat anything. Nevertheless, certain foods may contribute to a subtle closure in your body, emotions, and mind, and therefore instigate closure in your relationships.

Your recent posts have demonstrated the approximate maturity level of the fungus in Deida's left big toe, but hey, why not plagiarize him a bit and see what happens.

Genius is another word for magic, and the whole point of magic is that it is inexplicable. Margot Fonteyn

sds wrote:

kirsten wrote:

sds wrote:

Kirsten are you referring to Pearl as the her.... in this post?

If so, it is good that you are jobless, for it is really not a job for anyone to do. It is best to leave people alone and mind your own business in my opinion. It is best to look for ones own inconsistencies and contradictions and leave others alone.

''It is best to leave people alone and mind your own business in my opinion.''

oh, haha, well that's a good one sds, let me take you as an example, ok ?

I take this one with me to sleep. This one was a gem, a precious gem. Thank you Kirsten for it, I will reflect on this one for awhile. You were a great mirror for me today. Love ya.....

you won't hear me say that we should leave eachother alone here at this forum,
because it is about k's teachings, the mind and the human condition, which is us.

Eden, stop plagarizing David Deida... in your writings....

He is a follower of the cult guru Da Free John, and even has the Da in his last name, sick man this David Dei-da is....

Stop being a follower Eden and be yourself.

Forget all this openness and love crap, drop it all, and look afresh...

This is what K suggests....

pearl wrote:

Genius is another word for magic, and the whole point of magic is that it is inexplicable. Margot Fonteyn

Cool video pearl!

BobD wrote:

pearl wrote:

Genius is another word for magic, and the whole point of magic is that it is inexplicable. Margot Fonteyn

Cool video pearl!

Incredible, isn't it, Bob, just look at those two people, Bob, what great beauty, love wonder that flows between them, the whole song, video is just is so cool.  AND, bob, you should see my exquisitely, graceful, feminine, agile body dance to it's beat....the way it flows effortlessly....
it would put any dancers of the world to shame, easily, and you know, Bob, I don't follow any dance methods, any types of dances and have never been trained, never learnt it form anyone, just a little when I was very very small.:-)

Perhaps he doesn't have the most exquisite body but he's the only one who is actually totally present!  Now, that's no less magical feat, that too living admist such dead walking zombies like you.

Last edited by pearl (2012-02-26 15:46:35)

pearl wrote:

Perhaps he doesn't have the most exquisite body but he's the only one who is actually totally present!

I haven't the slightest doubt that you will continue to attract men with the integrity and full presence of BobD and sds into your life.

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

Eden, stop plagarizing David Deida... in your writings....

He is a follower of the cult guru Da Free John, and even has the Da in his last name, sick man this David Dei-da is....

Stop being a follower Eden and be yourself.

Forget all this openness and love crap, drop it all, and look afresh...

This is what K suggests....

More fungus level observations. 
As a matter of fact I am always looking fresh, which is why I can spot freshness from a mile away.

I find that deida is very skilled in certain ways, thus my casual interest. I don't follow anyone and to suggest such a thing again reveals your immaturity. I suggest you stick to your present stack of gurus as you are about as ready for Deida as a neanderthal was ready for Krishnamurti.

I am glad that you are always looking fresh. That is very important.

I am personally not interested in Deida, and am more attracted to real Gurus like Ramana Maharshi or the Buddha, not some new age cultic sex guy. But that is just my take on him, and each to their own. If you find something of value in his teachings, who am I to say anything. If you find him skilled, yes, continue your casual interest in him. Just be aware of his background that I posted.

I am glad also that you do not follow anyone. Sorry if my immaturity showed again, popped up its ugly head. I really shouldnt assume such a thing, that is, that you are a follower.

As for me, I will stick with my current stack of K books. I cant go wrong with K.

Now I disagree with your statement though that I am not ready for Deida. I am more than ready, and actually way ahead of him. When you have studied K as deeply as I have, someone like Deida is actually kindergarten material for me.

sds wrote:

Eden wrote:

sds wrote:

Eden, stop plagarizing David Deida... in your writings....

He is a follower of the cult guru Da Free John, and even has the Da in his last name, sick man this David Dei-da is....

Stop being a follower Eden and be yourself.

Forget all this openness and love crap, drop it all, and look afresh...

This is what K suggests....

More fungus level observations. 
As a matter of fact I am always looking fresh, which is why I can spot freshness from a mile away.

I find that deida is very skilled in certain ways, thus my casual interest. I don't follow anyone and to suggest such a thing again reveals your immaturity. I suggest you stick to your present stack of gurus as you are about as ready for Deida as a neanderthal was ready for Krishnamurti.

I am glad that you are always looking fresh. That is very important.

I am personally not interested in Deida, and am more attracted to real Gurus like Ramana Maharshi or the Buddha, not some new age cultic sex guy. But that is just my take on him, and each to their own. If you find something of value in his teachings, who am I to say anything. If you find him skilled, yes, continue your casual interest in him. Just be aware of his background that I posted.

I am glad also that you do not follow anyone. Sorry if my immaturity showed again, popped up its ugly head. I really shouldnt assume such a thing, that is, that you are a follower.

As for me, I will stick with my current stack of K books. I cant go wrong with K.

Now I disagree with your statement though that I am not ready for Deida. I am more than ready, and actually way ahead of him. When you have studied K as deeply as I have, someone like Deida is actually kindergarten material for me.

The same, the ramanas, the deidas, maharishis, all lifeless vegetables..

sds wrote:

But that is just my take on him, and each to their own.

Your take is entirely ignorant, uninformed, and utterly presumptuous, which is all but a lame attempt to discredit my observations by somehow discrediting someone I have a certain respect for.

Deida lived with Adi Da for a time in the 80's and he felt he helped him break through some patterns at that time in his life. He shortly after that totally disassociated himself with him and as far as I know has never even mentioned his name.  Adi Da was a nut job on every level as far as I am concerned. 

sds wrote:

As for me, I will stick with my current stack of K books. I cant go wrong with K.

Now I disagree with your statement though that I am not ready for Deida. I am more than ready, and actually way ahead of him. When you have studied K as deep as deeply as I have, someone like Deida is actually kindergarten material for me.

Funny, since you know nothing about Deida's work other than some derogatory posting you just searched for on google.

Again, your immaturity is glaring and any dialogue with you would be simply me negating your false assertions all day long. Gosh, that sounds fun but I'm gonna pass.  I've had enough of that with pearl for a lifetime, at least.