Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
beans wrote:
Yeah, tree, it is apparent you like looking at others (esp women) much more than at yourself. It's one of the things that's so amusing...
oh dear, what might i see?
Offline
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
Yeah, tree, it is apparent you like looking at others (esp women) much more than at yourself. It's one of the things that's so amusing...
oh dear, what might i see?
try it and find out, t
Offline
natura wrote:
beans wrote:
Nice photo, is there a story behind it?
(The universe loves you too.)Of course, there is a long (maybe without beginning and end) story behind it.
Everything is made for you, just listen.
? "Everything is made for you" sounds like a common belief of the most selfish - not characteristic of something natura would say.
natura wrote:
To make it shorter let’s start from my appearance in this world and acquiring skilling for photography. To make it even shorter, let’s skip to the moment, the Fate dragged me to the Tribulation Cape, (see in Google), the area of most lush rainforest in Australia; specifically, to a creek of crystal clarity water and without those bloody crocodiles in there.
When I’d put off my clothes for swimming I saw those things lying on the ground. They were so amazingly big and beautiful that I remembered you and thought you must have seen them, at least on picture.
So I picked them, set them up and made some pictures.
Now you say they are nice – good reword for my efforts.
btw, the bloody midgets attacked me meanwhile from the air and inflicted so heavy losses to my body that it was badly swollen in many places and I couldn’t really sleep several next nights.
Tribulation Cape looks like a beautiful place - and fortunately too humid and unpredictable for many people to live in and trash. To say Fate dragged you there is hilarious - it's just natura doing what he does - nothing mystical, right ;-)
natura wrote:
btw, again, who is that Universe, you say, that loves me?
Well, young natura, love is the flow of life when ego is not in the way. Love is not sentimental sayings, though some seem to have an image of others reacting to these sayings, especially those of the opposite gender. In fact, they can be seen for what they are. And sometimes we find two humans trading sentimental sayings and thus generating a feeling of comfort and security, as with a mantra.
Offline
beans wrote:
? "Everything is made for you" sounds like a common belief of the most selfish - not characteristic of something natura would say.
I thought it was not so necessary natura would say only characteristic things, sorry.
…but the story was for you, anyhow.
beans wrote:
Tribulation Cape looks like a beautiful place - and fortunately too humid and unpredictable for many people to live in and trash.
Indeed, it’s beautiful. Too humid? I was there in winter, intentionally of course; nothing of humidity – pleasurable warmth, day and night. People living there are doing well. Plenty of tourists, including from the US of course, makes business as lush as the nature itself.
beans wrote:
To say Fate dragged you there is hilarious - it's just natura doing what he does - nothing mystical, right ;-)
“The stupid is as stupid does”…something like that?
natura wrote:
btw, again, who is that Universe, you say, that loves me?
beans wrote:
Well, young natura, love is the flow of life when ego is not in the way. Love is not sentimental sayings, though some seem to have an image of others reacting to these sayings, especially those of the opposite gender. In fact, they can be seen for what they are. And sometimes we find two humans trading sentimental sayings and thus generating a feeling of comfort and security, as with a mantra.
Thanks for that, granny. But yet, who is that loves me?
Offline
tree wrote:
thank you madam secretary
Have no fear, t...just a regular woman...nothing to fear
Offline
natura quipped: “The stupid is as stupid does”…something like that?
beans: Nah, but "mystical" is just an idea, right?
natura: Thanks for that, granny. But yet, who is that loves me?
granny-bean: Well, young'un, I reckon it's intelligence/awareness that loves ya. A person can act with this intelligence/awareness/love, but it has nothing to do with a sentimental reaction to a particular person by another particular person.
Offline
beans wrote:
beans: Nah, but "mystical" is just an idea, right?
I think it is right.
An event is mystical only if there is no understanding of its origin. Then mind speculations get unleashed.
The written language was considered in old times as mystic. Today, you would be probably one of the greatest magicians.
natura wrote:
Thanks for that, granny. But yet, who is that loves me?
beans wrote:
granny-bean: Well, young'un, I reckon it's intelligence/awareness that loves ya. A person can act with this intelligence/awareness/love, but it has nothing to do with a sentimental reaction to a particular person by another particular person.
Now I know what you recon, my loved one.
Offline
Trying to fight the scary monster with mitigating images won't end the fear, t
Offline
natura wrote:
Now I know what you recon, my loved one.
Excellent, my racecar shiny oatmeal quartz chicken toenail one.
Offline
beans wrote:
Trying to fight the scary monster with mitigating images won't end the fear, t
which monster might that be?
Offline
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
Trying to fight the scary monster with mitigating images won't end the fear, t
which monster might that be?
The one in your head, t - the one that 'must be objectified,' mitigated, etc
Offline
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
Trying to fight the scary monster with mitigating images won't end the fear, t
which monster might that be?
The one in your head, t - the one that 'must be objectified,' mitigated, etc
and what is the evidence for this diagnosis?
Last edited by tree (2012-09-06 00:23:48)
Offline
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
which monster might that be?The one in your head, t - the one that 'must be objectified,' mitigated, etc
and what is the evidence for this diagnosis?
A body of work three-and-a-half years in the making, t
Offline
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
The one in your head, t - the one that 'must be objectified,' mitigated, etcand what is the evidence for this diagnosis?
A body of work three-and-a-half years in the making, t
that would be a ballet
Offline
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
and what is the evidence for this diagnosis?A body of work three-and-a-half years in the making, t
that would be a ballet
Well, you are quite the dancer....T "Tutu" X ?
The forum is your theatre.
Offline
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
A body of work three-and-a-half years in the making, tthat would be a ballet
Well, you are quite the dancer....T "Tutu" X ?
The forum is your theatre.
you know i don't play
Offline
t-play wrote:
you know i don't play
I know you like to think you don't play.
(One dost protest too much "no phonies.")
Offline
beans wrote:
t-play wrote:
you know i don't play
I know you like to think you don't play.
(One dost protest too much "no phonies.")
thanks b, no cat fights for me
Offline
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
t-play wrote:
you know i don't play
I know you like to think you don't play.
(One dost protest too much "no phonies.")thanks b, no cat fights for me
And no dog fights for me, t
It's plain to see
Where one's stuck, not free
Toodles
Offline
tree wrote:
(play with your self)
Offline