Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
WhiteShaman wrote:
I think what Hermann is suggesting behind the color of his words is that to look at what it means to be........................(put anything you want here), is to be caught up in the relationship of "I" the story and the feeling, which when looked at is "I" the story.
When one is truly alone, then there nothing noticed...as I see it.
When I draw portraits, I get lost in it.....I cannot come back and tell you what it means to get lost in art..............I can just notice that it happens...afterwards.
you are right with this, but hermann is far away from that. it is only another image of "nothing noticed"
Offline
beans wrote:
tree wrote:
beans wrote:
Without a full, constant understanding, one is just dabbling. And can't recognize signs of disease....regardless of the green rubber clogs ;-)how perceptive
OK, tree, enjoy the clog dance, while the rose has black spot...
enjoy your tax cut
Offline
?
Nice political tactic, tho.
Offline
awareness wrote:
WhiteShaman wrote:
I think what Hermann is suggesting behind the color of his words is that to look at what it means to be........................(put anything you want here), is to be caught up in the relationship of "I" the story and the feeling, which when looked at is "I" the story.
When one is truly alone, then there nothing noticed...as I see it.
When I draw portraits, I get lost in it.....I cannot come back and tell you what it means to get lost in art..............I can just notice that it happens...afterwards.you are right with this, but hermann is far away from that. it is only another image of "nothing noticed"
I can only look at Hermanns actions and what they stir in me...or not. I cannot look at his intentions. I try not to judge such things..............probably cuz I dislike that being done to me. I don't know him and I can't know him.
Last edited by WhiteShaman (2012-07-28 09:24:03)
Offline
just look at mankinds stream of conscioussness, which is you and me, his and her...
Offline
awareness wrote:
WhiteShaman wrote:
I think what Hermann is suggesting behind the color of his words is that to look at what it means to be........................(put anything you want here), is to be caught up in the relationship of "I" the story and the feeling, which when looked at is "I" the story.
When one is truly alone, then there nothing noticed...as I see it.
When I draw portraits, I get lost in it.....I cannot come back and tell you what it means to get lost in art..............I can just notice that it happens...afterwards.you are right with this, but hermann is far away from that. it is only another image of "nothing noticed"
From my perspective, one can look at what it means to be "I" and notice everything without identifying with it.
Offline
beans wrote:
awareness wrote:
WhiteShaman wrote:
I think what Hermann is suggesting behind the color of his words is that to look at what it means to be........................(put anything you want here), is to be caught up in the relationship of "I" the story and the feeling, which when looked at is "I" the story.
When one is truly alone, then there nothing noticed...as I see it.
When I draw portraits, I get lost in it.....I cannot come back and tell you what it means to get lost in art..............I can just notice that it happens...afterwards.you are right with this, but hermann is far away from that. it is only another image of "nothing noticed"
From my perspective, one can look at what it means to be "I" and notice everything without identifying with it.
Within oneself yes but within another?
Offline
beans wrote:
?
Nice political tactic, tho.
(right, keep counting)
Offline
Here, why not complete the image…
Last edited by beans (2012-07-28 09:38:13)
Offline
o)
thanks, spielberg
Offline
WhiteShaman wrote:
beans wrote:
awareness wrote:
you are right with this, but hermann is far away from that. it is only another image of "nothing noticed"From my perspective, one can look at what it means to be "I" and notice everything without identifying with it.
Within oneself yes but within another?
With oneself there is the ability to perceive thoughts, emotions, sensations as well as patterns of action. With others we have input also - it is just more limited. If a person is aware enough to watch the rising of their thoughts, they can understand useful images vs images that the "I" may want to invest in.
Offline
tree wrote:
my garden is not a dream
tree wrote:
o)
thanks, spielberg
welcome, tree, have a nice day yourself ;-)
Last edited by beans (2012-07-28 09:55:26)
Offline
well, it's a blessed day and i know it's beautiful there because i'm close, i hope you have more to enjoy than your theorems
Offline
There is one thing that is much easier to see in another than in oneself. That is the quality that k calls the false. In respect to another, I have nothing to protect.
Offline
It is usually easier to see the false in another, unless one has an investment in their images of another (ie the images serve to protect one's own belief system or identity whatever form that may take)
Offline
tree wrote:
well, it's a blessed day and i know it's beautiful there because i'm close, i hope you have more to enjoy than your theorems
Stopped by Bass Hole Beach recently on a drive through, lol - your post made me think of it.
Offline
beans will be beans
Offline
Ahaha!...too much fun, leafy - thanks.
Offline
beans wrote:
It is usually easier to see the false in another, unless one has an investment in their images of another (ie the images serve to protect one's own belief system or identity whatever form that may take)
Yes, I might put it even more strongly - our view of others is generally distorted by self-interest. Yet the difficulty of seeing the false in oneself is immeasurably greater. It's almost by definition that we don't see the false in ourselves - for any such seeing would effect immeasurable changes in our selves. And so we hesitate - usually forever.
Offline
the experts speak...
Offline
tree wrote:
the experts speak...
Observation, watson
Offline
dont feed the troll
Offline
hermann wrote:
beans wrote:
It is usually easier to see the false in another, unless one has an investment in their images of another (ie the images serve to protect one's own belief system or identity whatever form that may take)
Yes, I might put it even more strongly - our view of others is generally distorted by self-interest. Yet the difficulty of seeing the false in oneself is immeasurably greater. It's almost by definition that we don't see the false in ourselves - for any such seeing would effect immeasurable changes in our selves. And so we hesitate - usually forever.
Yes, generally, sometimes, once in a while...no way of being is carved in stone.
"Forever" -- that's a projection. "And so we hesitate - usually forever." - to say this kind of wards off any possibility of change, it seems.
[fixed misspelling of "off"]
Last edited by beans (2012-07-28 12:19:22)
Offline
awareness wrote:
dont feed the troll
It's all in fun....
Offline
its dangerous to be funny with a confused mind
Offline