KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

amardaya · 2012-07-11 13:38:20

bruce sean wrote:
You may have talked about yourself, or it flashed through your mind that you did, but you've also talked about me, since later you've explained that what I'm doing here is no different from what pearl was doing, and since she got banned and I didn't, and I'm doing the exact same thing...get it?

But I have a suggestion for you, and for roots, who seem to be missing her: it's very, very simple; just e-mail her, and enjoy private conversations for as long as you like, without others having to read some obscenities. She likes e-mailing people, so there you go: talking privately to a person who you consider also physically attractive-it's a win-win scenario.

Obviously you're simply pretending to know pearl, gossipping about what you think she likes and doesn't. On reading your posts I found you to be nothing but passive aggressive not a wee bit close to enlightenment at all. Something lacking in your posts, insight, I would say. Hope you don't mind me saying so. I'm saying honestly.

amardaya · 2012-07-11 13:43:16

Wowie, really, really interesting how people here keep going on about pearl and how hurt they are by her(jayaraj, bruce)even after she is long gone from the forum. But, still they have not contributed any good posts, jayaraj and rbuce. And now I'm sure they're going to report me to the admin. Wowie, you're true individuals, aren't you? :-)

joe · 2012-07-11 16:36:19

hiya sam, hope you are well...

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:16:12

Hiya brother! Donno about sam or who ever but I am doing great. Thanks. I am actually not just doing great, infact, super fabulous, sexy, healthy, blessed, loved, and even cared for by the absolutely stunning gorgeous universe! wooohoo! Yayh! hahaha. So much love to you sweet brother. Keep dancing.

Last edited by amardaya (2012-07-12 08:17:57)

beans · 2012-07-12 08:19:00

Hi pearl. Did you go to the Montreal Jazz Festival? I went one year, years ago. It was fantastic.

joe · 2012-07-12 08:20:48

samata wrote:
Keep dancing.

might as well, might as well, sam...

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:23:28

beans wrote:
Hi pearl. Did you go to the Montreal Jazz Festival? I went one year, years ago. It was fantastic.

Hi Beans, yes it must be great. If you come to Montreal, let me know. Would be nice to see in person. Ok?

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:26:02

joe wrote:
samata wrote:
Keep dancing.
might as well, might as well, sam...

Brother, t's nice to say hi to you this mornin'. Howz da things going? :-)

beans · 2012-07-12 08:27:40

amardaya wrote:
beans wrote:
Hi pearl. Did you go to the Montreal Jazz Festival? I went one year, years ago. It was fantastic.
Hi Beans, yes it must be great. If you come to Montreal, let me know. Would be nice to see in person. Ok?

Anything's possible, pearl....

joe · 2012-07-12 08:34:08

amardaya wrote:
joe wrote:
samata wrote:
Keep dancing.
might as well, might as well, sam...
Brother, t's nice to say hi to you this mornin'. Howz da things going? :-)

as things go, just fine thanks...off to work, have a good one.

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:38:19

beans wrote:
amardaya wrote:
beans wrote:
Hi pearl. Did you go to the Montreal Jazz Festival? I went one year, years ago. It was fantastic.
Hi Beans, yes it must be great. If you come to Montreal, let me know. Would be nice to see in person. Ok?
Anything's possible, pearl....

Cool....(btw, I saw your pictures and thought they were absolutely lovely, breath taking. you're absultely gorgeous gal!)

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:39:28

joe wrote:
amardaya wrote:
joe wrote:

might as well, might as well, sam...
Brother, t's nice to say hi to you this mornin'. Howz da things going? :-)
as things go, just fine thanks...off to work, have a good one.

Have a great one, brother! :-)

amardaya · 2012-07-12 08:43:29

Beany I thought you were too hot and beautiful beany! And really cute! I mean how can anyone be all of that at once. I'm puzzled, now. But keep rocking. what ever you're doing it's working for you surely! I mean sweetz!:-)

hermann · 2012-07-12 13:18:00

BobD wrote:
lol. Pearl? Really jayaraj...pearl? Admin...check please! Really...can anything good come from this childish gibberish? I think the forum should follow suit and ban itself.

Not so. The more insane our postings here become, the more likely the chance of seeing that insanity. The beginning of seeing may well be the discovery of our own insanity.

hermann · 2012-07-12 13:30:45

What is a k-site like this - in the end - but a kind of confessional? What brings us here - in the end - is our inability to shrug off the self? And, since that is utterly impossible, we cough up the broken bits of that self that we don't actually understand. And then maybe we can return and read our regurgitates.

bruce sean · 2012-07-12 15:16:09

amardaya wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
You may have talked about yourself, or it flashed through your mind that you did, but you've also talked about me, since later you've explained that what I'm doing here is no different from what pearl was doing, and since she got banned and I didn't, and I'm doing the exact same thing...get it?

But I have a suggestion for you, and for roots, who seem to be missing her: it's very, very simple; just e-mail her, and enjoy private conversations for as long as you like, without others having to read some obscenities. She likes e-mailing people, so there you go: talking privately to a person who you consider also physically attractive-it's a win-win scenario.
Obviously you're simply pretending to know pearl, gossipping about what you think she likes and doesn't. On reading your posts I found you to be nothing but passive aggressive not a wee bit close to enlightenment at all. Something lacking in your posts, insight, I would say. Hope you don't mind me saying so. I'm saying honestly.

You are the least interesting person for me; oh boy, the nonsense is back.

bruce sean · 2012-07-12 15:20:18

amardaya wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
BobD wrote:

I'm not sure what post of yours I did not respond to so I don't have an answer for you there. Bruce does all the things pearl was accused of doing minus the swear words is all I was saying. Bruce is convinced that he see's all and lets everyone else that disagrees with him know that he sees they don't. Same as pearl minus the colorful adjectives. Bruce sometimes says some good things (minus the colorful adjectives) Pearl also said a lot of good things and was attacked regardless of what she said...and it was simply due to hurt feelings because of past outbursts directed at several here. I once again say that Bruce is the new pearl...same mind frame that pearl was in minus the swear words. Bruce is the most powerful personality on the board currently. Doesn't mean thats a good thing but none the less he is. HE is not the one that should be banned...it is me because I simply don't buy into the acts of so called seriousness on this board. Quite frankly...I only come here for entertainment. I should be banned...thats all.
I couldn't agree with you more, Bob! I would ban anyone admitting they're not serious and come here just for fun, effective immediately!
LOL! Bruce, you're a typical American, you and your banning buisiness. Childish stuff, I'd say.

Banning may have its place in a serious discussion: k was doing it all the time-I would, too, I wouldn't even blink twice about it. There is no need for anyone to be here, there are many places to be, it has nothing to do with freedom: but who's not serious must go, it's that simple, no regrets.

bruce sean · 2012-07-12 15:24:50

BobD wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
Bob, you haven't looked in the mirror yet: look now. Do you see the reflection of a child who talks about others being children?
As for retard, the whole mankind is retarded, don't kid yourself that normal is not retarded, or that you are not 'normal'.
But you will not see that, my boy, before you will not be a child anymore. A child has no idea what enlightenment really is: he just heard other children talk about it, and he's made a few images about it. Children tend to have rich imagination.

As for banning, I have a suggestion: if you think you should be banned, why not ban yourself?! It will show some responsibility...
Yes bruce. And yes...you are the whole of mankind. And in watching you, I realize that this image of seriousness is laughable at best because of the "retarded" nature of the image of "seriousness" that you and a few others share. I have come here in the recent past like one might come back to view a train wreck because those on this board that claim that they "see", are nothing but train wrecks that hopped the tracks long ago. I do have my demand to be prevented from posting on this board permanently and to be taken off all KFA email lists in place. Tom has verified receiving my request so I imagine this will be one of the last, if not the last post I make here. I don't have a whole lot of residual dysfunctions left in my life and this board will be the most recent ones that I let go of. So before your request that I ban myself was proposed...I already had it done. Good to see we were on the same page there for a change.

Peace out brucey baby...and good luck in your fantasy quest.

Good, bob, good to see you go. Quite frankly, I haven't seen anything serious written in your name: only banter, insults, and some jokes.

One down, from the 'not-serious' list, a lot more to go.

But come back anytime you are serious about the whole thing, when you leave your jokes at the door, insults, all that. Anyone who's doing that is welcome.

beans · 2012-07-12 18:52:24

amardaya wrote:
beans wrote:
amardaya wrote:

Hi Beans, yes it must be great. If you come to Montreal, let me know. Would be nice to see in person. Ok?
Anything's possible, pearl....
Cool....(btw, I saw your pictures and thought they were absolutely lovely, breath taking. you're absultely gorgeous gal!)

Ah, you liked the avatar pics as much as I did, then! That was a ton of fun.

beans · 2012-07-12 18:55:30

bruce sean wrote:
BobD wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
Bob, you haven't looked in the mirror yet: look now. Do you see the reflection of a child who talks about others being children?
As for retard, the whole mankind is retarded, don't kid yourself that normal is not retarded, or that you are not 'normal'.
But you will not see that, my boy, before you will not be a child anymore. A child has no idea what enlightenment really is: he just heard other children talk about it, and he's made a few images about it. Children tend to have rich imagination.

As for banning, I have a suggestion: if you think you should be banned, why not ban yourself?! It will show some responsibility...
Yes bruce. And yes...you are the whole of mankind. And in watching you, I realize that this image of seriousness is laughable at best because of the "retarded" nature of the image of "seriousness" that you and a few others share. I have come here in the recent past like one might come back to view a train wreck because those on this board that claim that they "see", are nothing but train wrecks that hopped the tracks long ago. I do have my demand to be prevented from posting on this board permanently and to be taken off all KFA email lists in place. Tom has verified receiving my request so I imagine this will be one of the last, if not the last post I make here. I don't have a whole lot of residual dysfunctions left in my life and this board will be the most recent ones that I let go of. So before your request that I ban myself was proposed...I already had it done. Good to see we were on the same page there for a change.

Peace out brucey baby...and good luck in your fantasy quest.
Good, bob, good to see you go. Quite frankly, I haven't seen anything serious written in your name: only banter, insults, and some jokes.

One down, from the 'not-serious' list, a lot more to go.

But come back anytime you are serious about the whole thing, when you leave your jokes at the door, insults, all that. Anyone who's doing that is welcome.

Yes, and we should also kick out anyone who doesn't have blue eyes.

joe · 2012-07-12 20:05:31

I am left handed...

beans · 2012-07-12 20:21:07

Going to have to get in the queue behind those with large thumbs.

amardaya · 2012-07-12 23:49:00

bruce sean wrote:
amardaya wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
You may have talked about yourself, or it flashed through your mind that you did, but you've also talked about me, since later you've explained that what I'm doing here is no different from what pearl was doing, and since she got banned and I didn't, and I'm doing the exact same thing...get it?

But I have a suggestion for you, and for roots, who seem to be missing her: it's very, very simple; just e-mail her, and enjoy private conversations for as long as you like, without others having to read some obscenities. She likes e-mailing people, so there you go: talking privately to a person who you consider also physically attractive-it's a win-win scenario.
Obviously you're simply pretending to know pearl, gossipping about what you think she likes and doesn't. On reading your posts I found you to be nothing but passive aggressive not a wee bit close to enlightenment at all. Something lacking in your posts, insight, I would say. Hope you don't mind me saying so. I'm saying honestly.
You are the least interesting person for me; oh boy, the nonsense is back.

If at all you are serious as you claim you'll see that what you're saying above is not coming from insight, but past/hurt/self/ego/time which is the personal.

amardaya · 2012-07-12 23:52:45

beans wrote:
amardaya wrote:
beans wrote:

Anything's possible, pearl....
Cool....(btw, I saw your pictures and thought they were absolutely lovely, breath taking. you're absultely gorgeous gal!)
Ah, you liked the avatar pics as much as I did, then! That was a ton of fun.

:-)

bruce sean · 2012-07-13 01:04:56

amardaya wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
amardaya wrote:

Obviously you're simply pretending to know pearl, gossipping about what you think she likes and doesn't. On reading your posts I found you to be nothing but passive aggressive not a wee bit close to enlightenment at all. Something lacking in your posts, insight, I would say. Hope you don't mind me saying so. I'm saying honestly.
You are the least interesting person for me; oh boy, the nonsense is back.
If at all you are serious as you claim you'll see that what you're saying above is not coming from insight, but past/hurt/self/ego/time which is the personal.

No, it's coming from a crystal clear observation of a series of facts. It has nothing to do with me-I am not touched by it. Crystal-clear facts.

KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

Announcement

#51 2012-07-11 13:38:20

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

bruce sean wrote:

#52 2012-07-11 13:43:16

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#53 2012-07-11 16:36:19

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#54 2012-07-12 08:16:12

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#55 2012-07-12 08:19:00

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#56 2012-07-12 08:20:48

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

samata wrote:

#57 2012-07-12 08:23:28

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

beans wrote:

#58 2012-07-12 08:26:02

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

joe wrote:

samata wrote:

#59 2012-07-12 08:27:40

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

amardaya wrote:

beans wrote:

#60 2012-07-12 08:34:08

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

amardaya wrote:

joe wrote:

samata wrote:

#61 2012-07-12 08:38:19

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

beans wrote:

amardaya wrote:

beans wrote:

#62 2012-07-12 08:39:28

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

joe wrote:

amardaya wrote:

joe wrote:

#63 2012-07-12 08:43:29

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#64 2012-07-12 13:18:00

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

BobD wrote:

#65 2012-07-12 13:30:45

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#66 2012-07-12 15:16:09

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

amardaya wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

#67 2012-07-12 15:20:18

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

amardaya wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

BobD wrote:

#68 2012-07-12 15:24:50

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

BobD wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

#69 2012-07-12 18:52:24

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

amardaya wrote:

beans wrote:

amardaya wrote:

#70 2012-07-12 18:55:30

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

bruce sean wrote:

BobD wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

#71 2012-07-12 20:05:31

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#72 2012-07-12 20:21:07

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

#73 2012-07-12 23:49:00

Re: No response necessary. Just a question to ponder from the board troll:

bruce sean wrote:

amardaya wrote: