Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
This is a strange question, but when you are listening or watching a Krishnamurti video/audio, do you ever find yourself nodding off, or missing some stretches of his talk? I have been noticing this in myself lately, how I cannot seem to stay awake for all of it, or aware of everything he is saying. My mind wanders, I am not totally present, I think about different things and miss what he is saying, and other times, moments, I fall asleep or nod off for a few seconds to minutes. I dont think what he is saying is necessarily boring, but it seems to take a great deal of energy, alertness, passion, seriousness, to listen to it all, without missing anything. Any comments or similar experiences you want to share.
P.S. - I am also open to the possibility that I am touching upon some deeper dimension too during those moments of disappearing or nodding off....
Offline
"I hope you are working as hard as the speaker is doing." K quote from a talk, indicating that it is not just a lecture to listen to, but one has to look and see as he is looking and seeing, it is work.....
Offline
Yes I nod off, thoughts wander to. See, be aware of the fact they the videos, audios, are always new not for memorization . The talks are not just for the shallow upper conscious mind . The word penetration has been used an extraordinary number of times in the talks for a very good reason . :-)
Offline
everyone wrote:
Yes I nod off, thoughts wander to. See, be aware of the fact they the videos, audios, are always new not for memorization . The talks are not just for the shallow upper conscious mind . The word penetration has been used an extraordinary number of times in the talks for a very good reason . :-)
From one fellow k lover to another, thank you for your sharing. It is nice to know that I am not alone in this, and am in good company.
Offline
Yes. I remember thinking things like it is too much at once. I had to pause, rewind multiple times and work with different passages to see what he was saying.
Offline
LMP wrote:
Yes. I remember thinking things like it is too much at once. I had to pause, rewind multiple times and work with different passages to see what he was saying.
Yes, interesting, I can relate. I am amazed at his hour and 15 minute talks, how much is in there, how much is covered. It truly is exhausting, a lot of work to keep up with him....
Offline
sds wrote:
LMP wrote:
Yes. I remember thinking things like it is too much at once. I had to pause, rewind multiple times and work with different passages to see what he was saying.
Yes, interesting, I can relate. I am amazed at his hour and 15 minute talks, how much is in there, how much is covered. It truly is exhausting, a lot of work to keep up with him....
For everyone It is really good that You understand he stresses that very same point in so many ways .In school the teacher asks questions from some books whatever they be and we respond from memory . We cram information to pass tests but that is not learning how to think for ourselves individually, by cramming facts, and ideas even though in technical schools that is necessary . Learning for its own sake takes effort we do not mind putting in but we do have to rest, and digest.
Yes there are so many areas on the whole map of beliefs, ideas, and ideals we have not seen as blocking us ourselves . An approach negative, or positive, a right way to learn means concentration attention focused down through the filter of an idea . A mental blockage right from the first step so factually there is no one, that can point to an accurate approach with any idea . Freedom is in the very beginning not at the end . :-)
Offline
Inattention is an intrinsic part of our conditioning. Look at wild animals - are they not very attentive to the actual moment? Why are we so very different in this regard?
We think that attention is concentration, but it is not. The very process that is described, of the mind wandering away from K's words, is is in and of itself an incredibly interesting and valuable lesson in the functioning of habitual thought, and should not be looked upon as something to be 'rectified'.
Offline
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
pitfalll wrote:
Inattention is an intrinsic part of our conditioning. Look at wild animals - are they not very attentive to the actual moment? Why are we so very different in this regard?
We think that attention is concentration, but it is not. The very process that is described, of the mind wandering away from K's words, is is in and of itself an incredibly interesting and valuable lesson in the functioning of habitual thought, and should not be looked upon as something to be 'rectified'.
Yes not to be intentionally rectified by force, or effort, or concentration .For different points of view basically you ended up agreeing with those who responded by saying not to do anything about it just be aware of inattention. As Bohm said to K. once it appears that your trying to talk to our unconscious . Precisely replied K. that is what stillness is a conscious, and unconscious state of receptivity . :-)
Commentaries On Living, Series 1
Problems will always exist where the activities of the self are dominant. To be aware which are and which are not the activities of the self needs constant vigilance. This vigilance is not disciplined attention, but an extensive awareness which is choiceless. Disciplined attention gives strength to the self; it becomes a substitute and a dependence. Awareness, on the other hand, is not self-induced, nor is it the outcome of practice; it is understanding the whole content of the problem, the hidden as well as the superficial. The surface must be understood for the hidden to show itself; the hidden cannot be exposed if the surface mind is not quiet. This whole process is not verbal, nor is it a matter of mere experience. Verbalization indicates dullness of mind; and experience, being cumulative, makes for repetitiousness.
Awareness is not a matter of determination, for purposive direction is resistance, which tends towards exclusiveness. Awareness is the silent and choiceless observation of what is; in this awareness the problem unrolls itself, and thus it is fully and completely understood. A problem is never solved on its own level; being complex, it must be understood in its total process. To try to solve a problem on only one level, physical or psychological, leads to further conflict and confusion. For the resolution of a problem, there must be this awareness, this passive alertness which reveals its total process.
J. Krishnamurti Commentaries on Living Series I Chapter 41 'Awareness'
Last edited by everyone (2012-06-21 20:33:28)
Offline
pitfalll wrote:
Inattention is an intrinsic part of our conditioning. Look at wild animals - are they not very attentive to the actual moment? Why are we so very different in this regard?
We think that attention is concentration, but it is not. The very process that is described, of the mind wandering away from K's words, is is in and of itself an incredibly interesting and valuable lesson in the functioning of habitual thought, and should not be looked upon as something to be 'rectified'.
and if you are at all attentif you will see that we are all second hand people without real passion real energy and intensity to penetrate anything at all most of all our own hearts and minds.
Offline
You have come to the conclusion that we are all totally second hand people.
I would dissagree. There is a part of the mind which is first hand, but which gets subsumed under the torrent of habitual thought. Discovering this and allowing it to flower is meditation.
Last edited by pitfalll (2012-06-24 14:44:16)
Offline
pitfalll wrote:
You have come to the conclusion that we are all totally second hand people.
I would dissagree. There is a part of the mind which is first hand, but whish gets subsumed under the torrent of habitual thought. Discovering this and allowing it to flower is meditation.
indeed. i think there happens a synchroniciy within all brain cells.
Offline
pitfalll wrote:
You have come to the conclusion that we are all totally second hand people.
I would dissagree. There is a part of the mind which is first hand, but whish gets subsumed under the torrent of habitual thought. Discovering this and allowing it to flower is meditation.
and then what? 
Offline
One way of avoiding meditation is to ask such questions.
Offline
pitfalll wrote:
One way of avoiding meditation is to ask such questions.
it wasn't a question.
Offline
pitfalll wrote:
You have come to the conclusion that we are all totally second hand people.
I would dissagree. There is a part of the mind which is first hand, but whish gets subsumed under the torrent of habitual thought. Discovering this and allowing it to flower is meditation.
That is the division, and poor eden missed the opportunity to spot it!
The mind is completely conditioned, not partly.
Offline
Perhaps yours is bruce. It's the only one which you are in a position to make such a statement about.
Offline