KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

Eden wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

Are you starting a new game or do you think it's the same one, and wasn't mated yet?
  This is a new topic; the old one was that there is no league of one-if one exists, as a loner let's say, then one is actually a group.
No identifications, no neutral entity to exist.

  Now, the second challenge: I'm full of duality. Go ahead, prove it, back it up, don't just throw words out there.

Apparently you missed my 300 previous check mates, including the one in my previous post.

Any idiot can walk into a pre-school or a church and negate the little kiddies assertions all day long.  So what?  That's 99% of what you do here. The moment you make an assertion of any kind however, your duality is plain to see, and I have called you on it a hundred times, at least, literally.  How many dozen more times do I need to point it out before it counts?

So, do you want to take the move back, or do you want to continue and show specifically this duality; it shouldn't be that hard, since you say you'd done it before. Go ahead, show me the duality, show it to everyone, don't just keep it to yourself...

From 300 it grew to 1.000. That's what an imprecise mind does: it invents things to support its assertions.

  So, for the moment, you are taking that move back, since you haven't found a way to sustain it: for the moment, that line leads nowhere.

bruce sean wrote:

joe wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

Not by your definition, that's for sure. Nothing has changed" I was working then, I'm working now.
  I'm actually losing money by typing here...

ok maybe it was two or three years ago, but no big deal.  Not a security guard, not a bill collector, typing here makes you lose money, authority, reward and punishment...anything else you want to add?

Actually, that was sloppy, joe: a bill collector's job requiring movement and alertness??! It's like you lost track of what was said here half an hour before you wrote that. So much for a mind which wants to find out about another: which is why I don't take these questions too seriously.

a bill collector best be fast on their feet, if the bills they are collecting are in a certain part of town.  Slop that around a minute, as that is the bill collector I was talking about.  I did not say I wanted to find out about you, and in fact expressed the opposite.  What I am trying to do is see you for who you are.  I see that your thinking limits the way you receive words.  It is not personal just an observation.

wilbro99 wrote:

Hi suds!

Hi wibs!

joe wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

joe wrote:

ok maybe it was two or three years ago, but no big deal.  Not a security guard, not a bill collector, typing here makes you lose money, authority, reward and punishment...anything else you want to add?

Actually, that was sloppy, joe: a bill collector's job requiring movement and alertness??! It's like you lost track of what was said here half an hour before you wrote that. So much for a mind which wants to find out about another: which is why I don't take these questions too seriously.

a bill collector best be fast on their feet, if the bills they are collecting are in a certain part of town.  Slop that around a minute, as that is the bill collector I was talking about.  I did not say I wanted to find out about you, and in fact expressed the opposite.  What I am trying to do is see you for who you are.  I see that your thinking limits the way you receive words.  It is not personal just an observation.

I do not care what you want from me: understand who I am, or judge me or observe me-it's not my problem. What you want is your affair.

  I was trying to show that people are not serious, in general, when inquiring about other people. And when I said movement I didn't mean walking.

You may be included in that 'general'-you said bill collector when I said movement: if by driving a car from location to location you also mean movement then Bob D. also is included in that category, or was, since he quit; but that's not movement to me, driving a car; in fact cabbies carry around some of the biggest bodies in the city.

  I said that it's your affair because you don't have to say that it's personal or impersonal: it doesn't make a difference to me if it was personal or if it wasn't, that's why I said it's your affair.

This is what an immature mind can say; don't worry, you're in good company.

Chess has nothing to do with the perception of life: it is like a skill, any skill, but 'ability' to see the importance or lack of any skill has nothing to do with the skill.

I have a little more than a week on here, and then going away for 3 weeks. No, I am not being institutionalized, or put in jail, at least not yet, but am going on vacation and do not plan on being on the internet.

So dont worry too much about me or think something happened to me, Just taking a break from here for awhile starting July 7th.

And dont worry, I will come back the same old sds, no change, or transformation at all, so dont even ask such things.

bruce sean wrote:

Chess has nothing to do with the perception of life: it is like a skill, any skill, but 'ability' to see the importance or lack of any skill has nothing to do with the skill.

You missed the gist.

night wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

Chess has nothing to do with the perception of life: it is like a skill, any skill, but 'ability' to see the importance or lack of any skill has nothing to do with the skill.

You missed the gist.

Your point was that I'm better at chess than at this, so I better stick to chess.

  I know what you meant.

  But I also see that you keep missing the whole.

joe wrote:

Is it natural to you to talk?

When you came upon something extraordinary, which can be enjoyed by everyone and which can solve all of our problems as a human species, would you keep quiet?!

bruce sean wrote:

night wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

Chess has nothing to do with the perception of life: it is like a skill, any skill, but 'ability' to see the importance or lack of any skill has nothing to do with the skill.

You missed the gist.

Your point was that I'm better at chess than at this, so I better stick to chess.

  I know what you meant.

  But I also see that you keep missing the whole.

Keep analyzing.