Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
bruce sean wrote:
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
That is still thought.ah, ok , transformation is still thought?
That is what I'm suggestion: that 'standstill' is not yet transformation.
ah, ok, and now?
Offline
What is it that stops thought, and which is NOT thought?
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
What is it that stops thought, and which is NOT thought?
awareness
Offline
Awareness is still related to thought, it requires a conscious direction.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
Awareness is still related to thought, it requires a conscious direction.
NO, that is NOT right, sorry. awareness has no relationship to thought!!!
Offline
Tradition and Revolution (Ocurrences: 547)
Awareness is non-verbal. Awareness has no relationship to thought.K
Offline
More authority...The problem with authority is that you can often find both sides of a story, and then taking sides leads to division, and by then the fact is long gone. Look at it alone.
Offline
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
Awareness is still related to thought, it requires a conscious direction.
NO, that is NOT right, sorry. awareness has no relationship to thought!!!
It has an object, a direction, and so a center: thought is still there.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
Awareness is still related to thought, it requires a conscious direction.
NO, that is NOT right, sorry. awareness has no relationship to thought!!!
It has an object, a direction, and so a center: thought is still there.
no, sorry. awareness is NOT consciossness, it is in which there is the ending of consciossness. it is in which there is attention.
Offline
so it is the real not-knowing-state
Offline
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
awareness wrote:
NO, that is NOT right, sorry. awareness has no relationship to thought!!!It has an object, a direction, and so a center: thought is still there.
no, sorry. awareness is NOT consciossness, it is in which there is the ending of consciossness. it is in which there is attention.
You are mixing them up. Attention has a center, too.
Offline
awareness wrote:
so it is the real not-knowing-state
But that is NOT awareness, NOR attention.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
awareness wrote:
so it is the real not-knowing-state
But that is NOT awareness, NOR attention.
how can it be, if we are talking about something, to talk about something is not that something, its only a transfer-performance
Offline
I'm implying that it is beyond both.
Offline
ah, pure energy
Offline
So does that answer the question? Does that vanish thought?
Offline
awareness wrote:
ah, pure energy
all energy is pure.
gotta love these clever terms invented to keep duality alive. keep up the good work.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
So does that answer the question? Does that vanish thought?
transformation is in which there is the ending of thought. thought as matter is limited, therefore a part in the whole. the part is in the whole. the nature of thought is its limitation in time. so the ending of time is timelessness, in which there is the ending of thought. thats transformation: negative - positive - negative, or negation - affirmative - negation, energy - matter - energy, all in one, others, but not in a dualistic view.
Last edited by awareness (2012-06-06 19:19:01)
Offline
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
So does that answer the question? Does that vanish thought?
transformation is in which there is the ending of thought. thought as matter is limited, therefore a part in the whole. the part is in the whole. the nature of thought is its limitation in time. so the ending of time is timelessness, in which there is the ending of thought. thats transformation: negative - positive - negative, or negation - affirmative - negation, energy - matter - energy, all in one, others, but not in a dualistic view.
transformation has been going on forever, is going on, and will be going on forever. so what?
Offline
when the human overcomes the illusion of beliefs and ideas("thought") there are new challenges and new illusions to deal with. so what?
Last edited by Eden (2012-06-06 19:31:07)
Offline
Eden wrote:
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
So does that answer the question? Does that vanish thought?
transformation is in which there is the ending of thought. thought as matter is limited, therefore a part in the whole. the part is in the whole. the nature of thought is its limitation in time. so the ending of time is timelessness, in which there is the ending of thought. thats transformation: negative - positive - negative, or negation - affirmative - negation, energy - matter - energy, all in one, others, but not in a dualistic view.
transformation has been going on forever, is going on, and will be going on forever. so what?
That is change. Transformation is something else.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
That is change. Transformation is something else.
more fragmentation. more jibberish.
Last edited by Eden (2012-06-06 19:33:47)
Offline
awareness wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
So does that answer the question? Does that vanish thought?
transformation is in which there is the ending of thought. thought as matter is limited, therefore a part in the whole. the part is in the whole. the nature of thought is its limitation in time. so the ending of time is timelessness, in which there is the ending of thought. thats transformation: negative - positive - negative, or negation - affirmative - negation, energy - matter - energy, all in one, others, but not in a dualistic view.
If that is what vanish thought, not as a concept, but actually, then how does it happen? Does it happen directly? Is there contact between the two?
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
Is there contact between the two?
Hah. There is no "two" of anything to begin with, except in your imagination.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
Eden wrote:
awareness wrote:
transformation is in which there is the ending of thought. thought as matter is limited, therefore a part in the whole. the part is in the whole. the nature of thought is its limitation in time. so the ending of time is timelessness, in which there is the ending of thought. thats transformation: negative - positive - negative, or negation - affirmative - negation, energy - matter - energy, all in one, others, but not in a dualistic view.transformation has been going on forever, is going on, and will be going on forever. so what?
That is change. Transformation is something else.
i use change and transformation as synonyma
Offline