Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
That seems very interesting to me. Where did you get that material from?
Offline
RJ wrote:
bruce sean wrote:
It is possible, but only if one's eyes don't move during the day, otherwise they will move at night, too.
you're a wee bit psychotic Bruce
What do you mean by psychotic? Today I've heard a talk show over the readio, and they were talking about a cat killer, who also had sex with them, and they called him psychotic. And I'm like, hmm, maybe that's me, at least according to RJ, but I don't quite know what it really means, strictly speaking.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
That seems very interesting to me. Where did you get that material from?
The answer to that question is guarded by 9 Hunter ninja assassins. Also known as the "Hunter-nin"
Offline
Ah well, too bad. The alignment thing came to me like an insight, which probably is necessary anyways, even if one reads more about it-it still needs an insight.
Insight is here already so it's not a problem. I was just being curious.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
Ah well, too bad. The alignment thing came to me like an insight, which probably is necessary anyways, even if one reads more about it-it still needs an insight.
Insight is here already so it's not a problem. I was just being curious.
curiosity is good, except when it gets you killed by ninjas.
Offline
Not that curious as to risk my life over something which is already here.
Offline
CB wrote:
I don't see really see a connection yet... It seems that thought (as words in the head) can move when the eyes are still, and vice-versa, that the eyes can move when thought (as words) are not. So you are talking of thought that is deeper than the play of language right?
It also seems that the eyes are constantly moving, ever so slightly. Can only be kept still for couple seconds. Watching the eye movement, it is an interesting approach to "self-awareness," as opposed to following the play of words in the head. I see how it could reflect the "I" movement or the self/thinker/controller, but then any movement of the body could reflect that, right? And thought is "deeper" than the self...?
Haven't people been trying things like this for millenia?
When the eyes are not moving, thinking is not. When thinking is not, the eyes are not moving. This is especially true with one's eyes closed. With them open, a slight, very slight movement is necessary for perception reasons. But a big chunk which moves the eyes is thought: without it, the eyes are, more or less, still. This is something, in and of itself.
WHEN THE EYES ARE SHIFTING FROM ONE SIDE TO ANOTHER, SO DOES THOUGHT. When this shifting stops, thought stops, too, and there is stillness.
Offline
"hey God,
this rabbit needs dissection
it froze up in the light
oh well"
Offline
Your eyes are still moving, so stillness is not.
Offline
not moving your stillness is eyes are still so
Offline
Having fun is fine with me.
Offline