Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
pearl wrote:
let me teel ya there's no more stupid minds than the bruce's sds's and eden's of the world and you all must be put in a cage...
I'm quite certain you would put me in a cage if you could. Too bad you aren't sheriff.
Offline
pearl wrote:
What names are you talking about? And, it's strange that you're totally oblivious to the violence that is you, the psychological desire to dominate, to manipulate, to tiwst thing to suit your own agendas, etc, just because you think you are not calling names!!!!! lol!
What names?! Your posts are usually full of them. To simply pretend you are starting anew is not true, since the name-calling repeats itself, therefore it is NOT new. To ignore the pattern doesn't make the pattern vanish.
As for me, really, manipulating? You make me laugh: everyone is manipulating me, and everyone knows that, in daily life, and I have no problem with that.
Offline
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
let me teel ya there's no more stupid minds than the bruce's sds's and eden's of the world and you all must be put in a cage...
I'm quite certain you would put me in a cage if you could. Too bad you aren't sheriff.
Still wondering what name-calling?
Offline
pearl wrote:
Ok, listen if you want to understand. Why call onto beans and bruce who are themselves completely flailing around in deep waters of confusion. Just listen without resistance and then say what you have to say.
you came on the forum lately and the first thing you spoke of was about pearl to eden, the same usual. Note, it wasn't at all about inquiry, but it was about someone else.
ROFL. And your post above wasn't about someone else?
Poor sds....he thinks he can learn how to be sober from a drunk.
Offline
sds wrote:
pearl wrote:
I was somewhat perplexed as I'd seen a great potential in you, but in seeing this together now there is no past, no one to forgive, or accept. Everything already forgotten! :-)
There's this meeting, starting anew, innocently....and isn't it interesting that the only one who can set you free is your own seeing, understanding. :-)For me, this is it. Starting over, fresh, anew, innocently, as if it is a fresh new day, a new beginning. That is all one can do as a human being, to look afresh, seeing, understanding.... And the only one that can do it, is ourselves, we have to SEE for ourselves. No one can do it for us.
That's a great place to start, sds and wishing you the very best.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
pearl wrote:
What names are you talking about? And, it's strange that you're totally oblivious to the violence that is you, the psychological desire to dominate, to manipulate, to tiwst thing to suit your own agendas, etc, just because you think you are not calling names!!!!! lol!
What names?! Your posts are usually full of them. To simply pretend you are starting anew is not true, since the name-calling repeats itself, therefore it is NOT new. To ignore the pattern doesn't make the pattern vanish.
As for me, really, manipulating? You make me laugh: everyone is manipulating me, and everyone knows that, in daily life, and I have no problem with that.
Dream on little brother...you need something to cling to as well or else you'd be lost.
Offline
bruce sean wrote:
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
let me teel ya there's no more stupid minds than the bruce's sds's and eden's of the world and you all must be put in a cage...
I'm quite certain you would put me in a cage if you could. Too bad you aren't sheriff.
Still wondering what name-calling?
Nice projections of me projecting...;-)
Offline
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
let me teel ya there's no more stupid minds than the bruce's sds's and eden's of the world and you all must be put in a cage...
I'm quite certain you would put me in a cage if you could. Too bad you aren't sheriff.
SDS seems to have freed himself, but bruce and you seem content to be in the cage of your own making....oh well, if it's where you like to hang in...I won't disturb you.
Offline
RJ wrote:
give it a rest
Yeah, it's time he did just that!
Offline
pearl wrote:
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
let me teel ya there's no more stupid minds than the bruce's sds's and eden's of the world and you all must be put in a cage...
I'm quite certain you would put me in a cage if you could. Too bad you aren't sheriff.
SDS seems to have freed himself, but bruce and you seem content to be in the cage of your own making....oh well, if it's where you like to hang in...I won't disturb you.
Feel free to disturb me anytime and show me the cage. Thus far you seem too lazy to point it out. I've done my part to point out yours, but you refuse to answer the questions that would reveal their borders.
Offline
I been pointing out all along but you're lazy too lazy to see, or even acknowledge it.
Last edited by pearl (2012-04-15 05:43:52)
Offline
No, you haven't been pointing it out at all....you just keep shouting that it is there. Can you not see the difference?
Offline
Anyway...off to bed here. I'll check in tomorrow to see if you can muster up the energy to actually prove your claims. :-) Have fun. Nighty night girls.
Offline
Ego talk that is...muster energy, prove, claim...but goodnight little boy.
Offline
pearl wrote:
Ego talk that is...muster energy, prove, claim...but goodnight little boy.
The use of the word "energy" or "prove" in a sentence is proof of an ego? lol.
Listen honey buns...Oneness can't get any more "One" than it already is. With or without an ego, you and I are one. An ego can create the illusion of separation, but it can't actually create any separation at all as life is obviously one movement, one seamless organism. You and I are one, on every level, whether you like it or not, which means that obviously there is no "you" or "me".
Now some bodies may or may not see that fact and thus through temporary limited consciousness may fragment/perceive life in parts and divisions and labels and such, but even this is but a manifestation of the One/god/Love.
Fragmentation is just a simple challenge facing one of the species of animals on this planet--the human. It is really just an inefficiency in that specific organism. Some bodies grow out of it, and some don't. As is the case with all inefficiency, it will be weeded out in good time.
Offline
Eden wrote:
With or without an ego, you and I are one. An ego can create the illusion of separation, but it can't actually create any separation at all as life is obviously one movement, one seamless organism. You and I are one, on every level, whether you like it or not, which means that obviously there is no "you" or "me".
Now some bodies may or may not see that fact and thus through temporary limited consciousness may fragment/perceive life in parts and divisions and labels and such, but even this is but a manifestation of the One/god/Love.
Fragmentation is just a simple challenge facing one of the species of animals on this planet--the human. It is really just an inefficiency in that specific organism. Some bodies grow out of it, and some don't. As is the case with all inefficiency, it will be weeded out in good time.
Yeah, but you never see the fragmentation that you are!
Offline
pearl wrote:
Eden wrote:
With or without an ego, you and I are one. An ego can create the illusion of separation, but it can't actually create any separation at all as life is obviously one movement, one seamless organism. You and I are one, on every level, whether you like it or not, which means that obviously there is no "you" or "me".
Now some bodies may or may not see that fact and thus through temporary limited consciousness may fragment/perceive life in parts and divisions and labels and such, but even this is but a manifestation of the One/god/Love.
Fragmentation is just a simple challenge facing one of the species of animals on this planet--the human. It is really just an inefficiency in that specific organism. Some bodies grow out of it, and some don't. As is the case with all inefficiency, it will be weeded out in good time.Yeah, but you never see the fragmentation that you are!
There is nothing that God is not, obviously.
Offline
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
Eden wrote:
With or without an ego, you and I are one. An ego can create the illusion of separation, but it can't actually create any separation at all as life is obviously one movement, one seamless organism. You and I are one, on every level, whether you like it or not, which means that obviously there is no "you" or "me".
Now some bodies may or may not see that fact and thus through temporary limited consciousness may fragment/perceive life in parts and divisions and labels and such, but even this is but a manifestation of the One/god/Love.
Fragmentation is just a simple challenge facing one of the species of animals on this planet--the human. It is really just an inefficiency in that specific organism. Some bodies grow out of it, and some don't. As is the case with all inefficiency, it will be weeded out in good time.Yeah, but you never see the fragmentation that you are!
There is nothing that God is not, obviously.
O no, your god is a reflection of you, petty, violent, ugly, manipulative, vain, jealous, mediocre...limited.
Last edited by pearl (2012-04-15 21:15:23)
Offline
Obviously I'm not talking about my god, rather The One, Life, Love, God, The Beloved. It seems your body has a long list of evil things that Life/God is not. Such is the nature of the dualistic and fragmented mind. This body does not have such a list, therefore our bodies see life very differently.
Offline
pearl wrote:
O no, your god is ...limited.
I just said there is nothing that God is not. You just vomited out a list of things that God is not. So tell me, whose God is the limited one? Surely the answer is obvious to anyone sane. Even a child could answer that one.
Poor pearl...trying so hard to fragment God. How does that feel?
Offline
Eden wrote:
Obviously I'm not talking about my god, rather The One, Life, Love, God, The Beloved. It seems your body has a long list of evil things that Life/God is not. Such is the nature of the dualistic and fragmented mind. This body does not have such a list, therefore our bodies see life very differently.
I see no difference between a dogamtic religious fanatic who believes in god and you spouting about god, beloved, one life, one organism repeatedly...
You introduce the word god, and then the notion of evil, idealogies one has long negated perhaps as young as when I was 10 yrs! these are all your beelifs, your dual notions you push on others who have long negated and walked beyond all these non sensical idealogies!
Offline
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
O no, your god is ...limited.
I just said there is nothing that God is not. You just vomited out a list of things that God is not. So tell me, whose God is the limited one? Surely the answer is obvious to anyone sane. Even a child could answer that one.
Poor pearl...trying so hard to fragment God. How does that feel?
And I negate your shoddy notions of god and dump it in garbage, infact long ago. Go figure.
Offline
pearl wrote:
Eden wrote:
pearl wrote:
O no, your god is ...limited.
I just said there is nothing that God is not. You just vomited out a list of things that God is not. So tell me, whose God is the limited one? Surely the answer is obvious to anyone sane. Even a child could answer that one.
Poor pearl...trying so hard to fragment God. How does that feel?And I negate your shoddy notions of god and dump it in garbage, infact long ago. Go figure.
Of course you dump it in the garbage...to a fragmented mind, the Wholeness of God is pure rubbish.
Offline
Indeed, you and your gods are all but an invention of your insecured, petty minds and I dump it in garbage.
Offline