Make friends across the globe, post your photos and videos, write a blog or start a discussion, just go to jkrishnamurti.ning.com
Magnetic wrote:
tree wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
so we are going to need another one to be arround if you are going into labor too........
it is here without effort
true, but now is fun to pretend otherwise, or relationship may turn into another buddhist debate......you know the whoman race....... :)
Offline
You are me, and I am you.
Isn't it obvious that we "inter-are"?
You cultivate the flower in yourself,
so that I will be beautiful.
I transform the garbage in myself,
so that you will not have to suffer.
I support you;
you support me.
I am in this world to offer you peace;
you are in this world to bring me joy.
Thich Nhat Hanh
Offline
Begin with looseness and all is loose.
Offline
Eden wrote:
Begin with looseness and all is loose.
yep, begin with emptiness and all is empty:-)
Offline
questions waiting to be asked: bunny?
Offline
i am totally confused now, i ve lost the thread. i will go with spechlessness to bed now, thx for the very good inquiry together and have a nice day, magnetic.
Offline
Magnetic wrote:
awareness wrote:
i am totally confused now, i ve lost the thread. i will go with spechlessness to bed now, thx for the very good inquiry together and have a nice day, magnetic.
sleep well, and get ready for the next waking round.....this one was fun
right, the next round we must be serious!:-)
Offline
i understand. serioussness in which there is joy
Offline
if i dont know what it is, it may be truth;.)
Offline
Magnetic wrote:
awareness wrote:
if i dont know what it is, it may be truth;.)
it may not be known what exactly it is, but obviously is there. That it IS, isnt that great news.....
yes, it was also meant in communication. why to be so doubtful to the other communication-partner, as you are for example. but you have a very smooth communication-skill, magnetic. so it must be something (may be for me)..äh..or otherwise..hmm..i lost the thread again
Offline
ahjes...it was something with "inter-are" obove in the thread
Offline
i forgot how crazy the people are in the world, how their life is without this love
Offline
yes, thats it. using the words without the conditioned beyond, and speaking mainly about what is, which is unknown;-)
Offline
so understanding is in which there is love
Offline
Magnetic wrote:
awareness wrote:
so understanding is in which there is love
yeah, love understands beauty, understands peace, gentleness, magnificent, kindness, eternal life, sacredness, fearlessness, wholeness, passion, creativity, spontaneity...........understanding without love, is like a flower without parfume, without aroma, like a plastic flower, it looks like it is a flower, but is not, no smell, it does not attract life arround it-self, no bees come to it, no one goes to smell it, it is in the corrner there by it-self, to fill the gaps in the house, so it does not look empty.........
indeed, good night, magnetic
Offline
understanding in which is no intellect, no "I" who understood, how shall I transmit this understanding?
Offline
hey magneto, did you transformed from an bulgarian guy into an english man?;-)
Offline
Magnetic wrote:
awareness wrote:
hey magneto, did you transformed from an bulgarian guy into an english man?;-)
am trying, but my spelling gives it up..........
oh no, it s good. your language is excellent. you must put before a sentence a "well". where is your putting words in big letters?
Offline
Magnetic wrote:
awareness wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
am trying, but my spelling gives it up..........oh no, it s good. your language is excellent. you must put before a sentence a "well". where is your putting words in big letters?
well, the big letters are for topics relating to truth, these days i just goof around.....
did it sound better with the well upfront?
i overread it. but i think the "well" sounds snobistic. i will try not to use it. Do you mean in GOOFYING IS NO TRUTH?;-)
Offline
might be, feeling of katharsis is limited. it cannot replace the sense of transformation in which is the ending of consciousness
Offline
goofy wrote:
as i observe it, good goofying relationship had to stray away from TRUTH, meaning it had to be more of the imaginative play, the creative side of consciousnes, rather about the consciousness it-self........seems when truth is related about consciousnes, goofying attitude is leads to offence, have not found a way to goof around speaking the truth at the same time. Actually have done it a bit, but cannot go too deep, without being detected........and then creativity is turned into questioning about its nature, and is it beneficial, is it truth....stuff like this, which totally takes the point of goofying around......
mags, to wonk is to allow the creative side of consciousness to play with itself, which ends up with an understanding expressed in a way that it no longer has the imprimatur of seriousness.
It is as if there is a third-person report on one's first-person, where the distance between gets around the problem of ownership.
It is my experience of wonking that the third-person stance releases the first-person stance to the care of words, which leak like a sieve, which means that one's sense of self gets goofy.
![]()
Offline