KFA - Krishnamurti Foundation of America

Sorry willy, that is not the correct answer, nor is it particularly clever or funny. Don't worry though, there is still a Daily Double left on the other thread....

Eden wrote:

Thanks for keeping my life simple miss pearl.  The temptation of more feminine energy in my universe might be too much for me to handle as I am already swimming in it and with you I might just drown.

No problem.  It seems you already have your plate full.  :-) You say you love feminine energy and I wonder how can you ever have 'too much' of something you love? :-)

Here too surrounded by the sweetest, most beautiful masculine energy at its purest, uncontaminated, undiluted...  What a real gift it is for a woman like me.  Greatest joy indeed.  In the modersn day world most men have lost that innate, sweet quality and becoming like women, where as most women turning masculine in the way they look, carry themselves..interesting to observe.

Eden wrote:

Lovely beach day here....looking for seashells with the little one....playing chase, and being chased, then some swimming, more frolicking, a break for coconut juice and then off to another beach, more frolicking, some tide pool exploration, some more chasing, and then a stubbed toe necessitating a long piggy back ride....finally a blissful rest in the hammock at sunset.

Now, that's what I like to hear.  It's the best music to my ears.

Eden wrote:

Feeling myself opening, ever deeper, always noticing the subtle closures and transmuting them into evermore openness.

That's awesome and a breath of fresh air to know that.

bruce sean wrote:

The world is NOT wonderful.

LOL, what do you mean Bruce ? Are you blind to beauty ?

matsqqqq wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

The world is NOT wonderful.

LOL, what do you mean Bruce ? Are you blind to beauty ?

By the world I meant people. I wouldn't call them a thing of beauty. It doesn't matter how they're called, there is no beauty in them. That doesn't mean I'm bitter, or frustrated. It is so.

Eden wrote:

There is nothing more unselfish than total selfishness(which is why I don't even bother to use the word one way or the other).

Total selfishness is the state of the present mind: even when doing something which benefits another, it benefits itself first. Most minds are just that: completely selfish-there is NO partial selfishness. Even psychologists agree with that, I'm told.
  And like any fact, it stands by itself: there is NO partial selfishness.

bruce sean wrote:

Total selfishness is the state of the present mind: even when doing something which benefits another, it benefits itself first.

There is no "other". Your fragmented and concept ridden mind cannot grasp that basic fact.  A totally selfish mind cares for the "other" because it sees/feels clearly that in doing so it is actually caring for itself. 

bruce sean wrote:

Most minds are just that: completely selfish-there is NO partial selfishness. Even psychologists agree with that, I'm told.

Psychologists agree with you...wow....your credibility just got a super boost. 

bruce sean wrote:

And like any fact, it stands by itself: there is NO partial selfishness.

These minds that you think are selfish are anything but selfish....they are busy defending stories and myths, which is not selfishness at all.

Last edited by Eden (2011-12-29 21:03:01)

bruce sean wrote:

Eden wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

And all you are left to do is sharpen communication-that's all the body needs...

The body has many needs--it is busy sharpening many skills.  If you think my language skills are fairly impressive, well, you should see me open a coconut.

Is the body which has this need of sharpening communication? Or is it thought? Is it the body which identifies with a movement you talked of long time ago, a new culture, all that-or is it thought?

Is it the body that needs a coconut, or is it thought?  blah blah blah.  You cannot conceive of a human that is being driven by anything but "thought"...in fact you don't even believe they exist.   I could tell you all day long that this body was thirsty an hour ago and so it drank a coconut and it would prove nothing...all it would do is stimulate asinine replies from you like the one above asking me if I was actually thirsty or if it was thought telling me that the body was thirsty. 

Sorry to burst your bubble brucey, but this body has evolved to the point where it can distinguish.  Best of the luck in the tar pits....you seem to be sinking deeper by the day.

As for openness.....that is what drives this body, in my deepest cells.  The drive to open to all of life, to open other bodies, which is my own body.  I practice it daily, in my daily life....what skill can be more precious than to open other bodies to inifinite bliss....to enter that which is closed and bloom it open to god.

To a masculine body, nothing is more attractive in this entire universe than the feminine body, and no attraction is stronger than the pull to bloom open the feminine body to its fullest expression of divine love and light and sexuality and radiance and bliss(which are one), and to merge with her, dissolve into her.

Last edited by Eden (2011-12-29 21:23:04)

Eden wrote:

bruce sean wrote:

Defending is the essence of selfishness. Defending the enclosure in which the self lives. Or rather thinks it lives, but that's the reality for such a self, based on illusion or not, but it's its life: it thinks it lives within an enclosure.

Indeed...such is your daily routine...defending your pathetic ideas...unconscious limp attempts to spread your fragmented perception of life.   The evidence is plain to see, in fact I have proven it time and time again.

You're turning personal what I say. I pointed out that defending is the action of the self, since you said it is not, that's all. No need to dramatize and become emotional.

bruce sean wrote:

Yes, pleasure at its best. Fantasizing about it, getting excited about it-thought all the way. Look at it.

You mistake openess for pleasure.  Openness is certainly pleasurable, but it is much much more than that.  Your total closure is evident, as always.

bruce sean wrote:

You think there is but one mind: and so there's no need for doing something for another.

Only someone totally closed would leap to such an absurd conclusion.

The rat race getting you down sds? Or is it the just the winter blues?

pearl wrote:

sds wrote:

Eden wrote:

Only someone totally closed would leap to such an absurd conclusion.

Only someone who is so totally lost, full of himself, would make such grandiose statements as you continually do. You are doing nothing but making yourself look like a fool in the name of your so called sharpening of language. You are nothing but a spiritual beginner. Go back to spirituality 101 and when you are ready, come back here.

SDS, the man has some good and honest insights, unlike the women haters of this forum who are terrified and look down on women.  His honesty is refreshing unlike the shallow, pretentious words of the bruces, of the forum.

pearl, what had you there excavated? "the women haters"... lol, really good for a deep lough